Benchmarking Steinwurf’s FEC for SD-WAN Service Providers without an integrated FEC solution.

Following on from our previous blog post last week, the Steinwurf team also carried out extensive benchmarking comparing performance of Rely - our next gen, low latency FEC, to ARQ.

The benchmarking analysis goes on to show that by using Rely, SD-WAN service providers can gain a serious and significant performance advantage compared to using ARQ or other retransmission mechanisms.

Steinwurf’s FEC, is unique in its ability to offer a solution that’s good (reliable), fast (low latency), and cheap (lower repair cost and bandwidth usage) all at once!

These benchmarks are equally applicable to other verticals requiring low latency communications, but still relying on older retransmission mechanisms to provide reliability.

Click the link below to read the benchmarking analysis, and please do get in touch if you have any questions, or to try out our ultra low latency FEC - Rely for your own product or service.

Benchmarking Analysis Comparing Rely to ARQ

Image 1.jpg
Previous
Previous

Repetition Vs FEC in General

Next
Next

Benchmarking Steinwurf’s FEC for SD-WAN Service Providers